--- description: Learn how ReqView can help your business. GetApp provides users in New Zealand with the most detailed information on software reviews, prices and features. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: ReqView Reviews, Pricing & Ratings | GetApp NZ 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [IT Management Software](/directory/771/it-management/software) > [ReqView](/software/110317/reqview) # ReqView Canonical: https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/110317/reqview Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/110317/reqview?page=2) > ReqView is a simple yet powerful requirements management tool for development of software and systems products trusted by customers from regulated industries developing safety critical products with specific needs for risk driven approach, end-to-end requirements traceability and full audit trails. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 49 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Key benefits of ReqView • EASE OF USE - Capture well-structured requirements in a familiar tabular view resembling MS Word and Excel. • FLEXIBILITY - Manage requirements, tests, risks, and other project artifacts in one place using any process. • TRACEABILITY - Link requirements and other objects. Browse the requirements traceability matrix and generate multi-level traceability reports. • SECURITY - Comply with the highest security standards simply because no project data are sent to the Internet. • OFFLINE COLLABORATION - Collaborate with a distributed team by storing the project on a shared network drive or in your Version Control System. • OPEN FILE FORMAT - No need to be afraid of vendor lock-in. ReqView project data are human readable files with an open file structure. • REASONABLE PRICE - Use the basic ReqView features for free, or choose an annual plan enabling advanced features and remote support. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 49 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.1/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Eccam - **Founded**: 2004 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: €430.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: \* FREE plan: open any project as read-only, edit projects with 1 document, up to 150 objects, and one custom attribute \* PRO plan: 430 EUR/user/year for unlimited documents, objects, and attributes \* TEAM plan: 580 EUR/user/year for all in PRO + integration with Jira, ReqIF import/export, project history, and other features for better team collaboration \* ENTERPRISE plan: 1740 EUR/floating client/year for all in TEAM + efficient license sharing in larger teams using a floating license model. Minimum configuration with 3 floating clients starts at €5220/year. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Czechia, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Application Management - Audit Trail - Change Management - Collaboration Tools - Commenting/Notes - Compliance Management - Configuration Management - Customisable Reports - Customisable Templates - Customizable Fields - Data Import/Export - Document Management - Document Storage - Drag & Drop - Knowledge Management - Multiple Projects - Prioritisation - Reporting/Analytics - Requirements Review - Security Tools ## Integrations (11 total) - Apache Subversion - Bitbucket - Enterprise Architect - GitHub - GitLab - IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS - Jira - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Word - Polarion REQUIREMENTS - Windchill ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Chat ## Category - [IT Management Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/771/it-management/software) ## Related Categories - [IT Management Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/771/it-management/software) - [Requirements Management Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/967/requirements-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Confluence](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/90949/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/9953/jira) — 4.4/5 (15312 reviews) 3. [Aha\!](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/106671/aha) — 4.7/5 (561 reviews) 4. [reqSuite® rm](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/2039027/reqsuite-rm) — 4.6/5 (35 reviews) 5. [TraceCloud](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/2058586/tracecloud) — 4.1/5 (67 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good quality for money" — 4.0/5 > **David** | *18 December 2023* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to create and crosslink requirements, even between different projects. Underlying document is json and easy to understand. SVN support was a huge + > > **Cons**: No git support, When scrolling the window snaps to a random requirement, SVN does not support parallel work ----- ### "'Right-sized' between capability versus ease of use and maintenance." — 4.0/5 > **Malcolm** | *11 October 2017* | Medical Devices | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: We are a small development group that does not have the bandwidth to justify dedicated resources to learn and customize a complex tool. We have periods of heavy activity followed by months of not touching the tool, so ease of use was at the top of our list of priorities. Additionally, being in the medical device field, we already have many systems in place and do not want to disrupt what is already running smoothly. ReqView is very specific about what it is trying to accomplish, and does it well. It is easy to learn (we have only needed the online documentation) and the pricing makes it a no-brainer to start playing with. The product is definitely a work in progress, with new features being added on a regular basis. A couple of them have been as a result of requests I made personally, so you can't get better responsiveness than that\! Rather than trying to do everything, ReqView provides straightforward import and export to standard MS Office software. For version control, we treat it like source code in a Subversion database, but it can be used on a shared drive. Updates are easy and automatic. It's not SAAS, which our IT department would have nixed for security reasons, plus there's not the delay involved with remote servers. > > **Cons**: Customization of outputs to fit the needs of the project documentation is usually a bear, and ReqView is no exception. We had the same issue (except worse\!) with previous RM software. Someone who is well-versed in HTML and CSS might find this easy, and there is copious documentation available at w3schools.com, but I admit to spending much more time to generate a half dozen or so output scripts than the rest of the first project in its entirety\! Now they are done, so it's no longer an issue for the future, but it was a steep curve. Obviously, if you only need formats closer to those provided, your experience will be easier. > > An easy-to-implement and -maintain requirements management system. It doesn't try and be the answer to everything we have ever needed in our development process, which usually leads to overly complicated software which drives your system, rather than the other way around. ReqView fills just the slot we need it to. ----- ### "It works fine, very flexible and easy to use. I miss the possibility for trace and impact anala" — 4.0/5 > **Bernd** | *8 December 2017* | Industrial Automation | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy and flexible. Use of standards e.g. json. The csv export is useful. Exporting from a csv is a useful feature, but sometimes it won't work. > > **Cons**: I would like tpo have a intelligence in some rows. Referencing others and esecute a small script (e.g. LUA ). I miss the possibility to run two instaces with different projects. > > Linking between requirements of different documents (but without analysis) ----- ### "ReqView Product Review" — 5.0/5 > **Francois** | *11 January 2024* | Airlines/Aviation | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: ReqView is simple, yet has all the features needed to perform requirements management efficiently. The product support is excellent. Usually get service requests answered the same day or the day after. > > **Cons**: Don't have any particular issue with ReqView. > > Overall, I'm pleased with my experience with ReqView. I find it perfect for company's like ours that don't have a need for all the features of more complex systems like Doors or Polarion. Excellent software to introduce requirements management in a company. ----- ### "ReqView requirements management tool" — 4.0/5 > **Peter** | *16 March 2021* | Automotive | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The tool is easy to learn, very user friendly interface, easy to customize, useful help file. Allows the user to focus on the task of managing rqmts and not waste time learning the tool. The SVN integration is just great, makes commits, updates, merge a breeze. > > **Cons**: At the moment, you cannot view more than one document in a project at a time (you can open several projects at the same time) when linking and reviewing linked rqmts takes a little more effort. However, the people at ReqView have told this is planned to be fixed so two or more documents from the same project can be viewed at the same time. > > The support the team at ReqView give is incredible, always quick to respond to any questions, offering unprompted advise. Great bunch of people. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/110317/reqview?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/110317/reqview) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | ----- ## Structured Data