--- description: Learn how Submittable can help your business. GetApp provides users in New Zealand with the most detailed information on software reviews, prices and features. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: Submittable Reviews, Pricing & Ratings | GetApp NZ 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Government Software](/directory/669/public-sector/software) > [Submittable](/software/107673/submittable) # Submittable Canonical: https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/107673/submittable Page: 1 / 17\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/107673/submittable?page=2) > Submittable provides grant management and corporate social responsibility software for foundations, governments, and corporations. The platform enables organizations to build customizable application forms, manage review processes, and track program budgets in real time without technical expertise. It includes features for fraud prevention, impact reporting, and automated workflows that help streamline administrative tasks. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 398 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Key benefits of Submittable Enables streamlined management of grants and corporate social responsibility programs for diverse organizations, including governments, foundations, and corporations Provides no-code form building and automated workflows to simplify application, review, and fund distribution processes Offers real-time budget tracking and transparent impact reporting to support data-driven decision-making ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.8/5** | 398 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Submittable - **Location**: Missoula, US - **Founded**: 2010 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Other - **Pricing Details**: Submittable offers three main pricing plans with custom pricing that requires contacting the vendor for details. No explicit pricing values, free versions, or free trials are mentioned on the website. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English, Spanish - **Available Countries**: Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - ACH Payment Processing - AI/Machine Learning - API - Access Controls/Permissions - Accounting - Accounting Integration - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Ad hoc Reporting - Address Validation - Administrative Reporting - Alerts/Notifications - Applicant Portal - Applicant Tracking - Application Management - Approval Process Control - Assignment Management - Attendance Tracking - Audit Management - Audit Trail ## Integrations (21 total) - ActiveCampaign - Airtable - Bloomerang - Dynamics 365 - Gmail - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Invoice Ninja - Jira - Mailchimp - Mailjet - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Notion - Salesforce Platform ... and 6 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Government Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/669/public-sector/software) ## Related Categories - [Government Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/669/public-sector/software) - [Fundraising Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/169/fundraising/software) - [Donation Management Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/167/donation-management/software) - [Identity Verification Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/3854/identity-verification/software) - [Grant Management Software](https://www.getapp.co.nz/directory/170/grant-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Good Grants](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/160227/good-grants) — 4.8/5 (21 reviews) 2. [Fluxx Grantmaker](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/105791/fluxx-software-for-grantmakers) — 4.3/5 (95 reviews) 3. [MonkeyPod](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/157435/monkeypod) — 4.8/5 (101 reviews) 4. [RQ Platform](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/2049892/rq-awards) — 4.7/5 (40 reviews) 5. [Sage Intacct](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/10360/intacct) — 4.3/5 (711 reviews) ## Reviews ### "It provides me with all necessary services as a submitter. It provides all I require as an editor." — 5.0/5 > **Jeff** | *6 October 2017* > > **Pros**: Submittable is convenient. As a submitter, it provides efficient mechanisms for making submissions and efficient tracking of those submissions. As an editor, it provides me with notices and updates to allow me to process submissions quickly and efficiently. Submittable is practical. As a submitter, a single page allows me to keep track of active submissions to several publications. As an editor, the features for reaction and response to submitters makes my job much easier. Submittable is uncomplicated, easily used, and easy to understand. As a submitter, these qualities make submissions tracking manageable. Submittable is used widely enough to be familiar to virtually all writers and artists who submit work for publication. > > **Cons**: Our current package allows only 5 of our team members to have access to submissions. I could wish for more relaxed limits in that regard. ----- ### "Wize Way to Manage: A Grant Management Game Changer" — 5.0/5 > **Kristen** | *5 June 2024* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I appreciate most was the intuitive dashboard menu, which will allow our organization to effortlessly track and manage our grants. The interface for admin staff, external reviewer, and grantees is easy to navigate. The robust reporting features offer valuable insights, enabling us to make data-driven decisions and optimize our grant management process. The customizable workflows have allowed us to tailor the system to our unique needs, which we believe will result in enhanced efficiency. Additionally, I am impressed by the exceptional customer support provided by the WizeHive team, who are always responsive and helpful as I've needed assistance during the onboarding process. > > **Cons**: While I'm extremely pleased with our WizeHive subscription, we encountered some drawbacks during the onboarding process. Specifically, I discovered a few features mentioned in our initial sales call were not part of our subscription package and would require an additional fee, which was prohibitively expensive for our small organization. Also, some key functionalities that tipped the scales for us in favor of WizeHive over other grant management systems are not yet available but are expected to be added in future updates. > > Overall, I'm delighted with WizeHive and would highly recommend the NextZen platform to anyone seeking a reliable, user-friendly, and comprehensive grant management solution. By investing in this technology, we will elevate the experience for all stakeholders within our organization and ensure that our processes and tools reflect our grantee partnership objectives. ----- ### "Submittable is user-friendly, but only for applicants." — 2.0/5 > **Sydney** | *22 September 2022* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: The product is easy for applicants to use, with simple forms and clear application guidelines. Generally, we have had many applicants have no issues while applying, which is definitely a positive about the platform. > > **Cons**: For administrative staff who work grant programs on the back-end, features such as advanced reporting are sorely lacking. It's difficult to build these reports and pull through the data you need. Additionally, there are many small issues that Submittable merely provides "work-arounds" for, rather than solving problems. For example - tables that are put directly into an application form export as a separate file, and then would need to be merged in order to package applications. While the platform might make the process of applying smooth for applicants, there seem to always be headaches for our staff when processing applications afterwards. ----- ### "Great customer service and fast setup" — 5.0/5 > **Daniel** | *18 October 2023* | Nonprofit Organisation Management | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: We had a last-minute need for an online granting process and needed an affordable tool where we could get everything running quickly with minimal input from our end. Even though their development times are typically longer, they were willing to adapt to our timeline and still delivered the forms a week earlier\! Throughout the entire process, their support team has been amazing--always available, always happy to help and incredibly fast to turn things around. We hardly had to do any of the development ourselves, despite this being a last-minute request. As a small team with limited spare capacity, this was a lifesaver in being able to keep to our grantmaking timeline. > > **Cons**: While the functionalities are enough for most organizations' granting needs, there are a few customization options, such as greater flexibility with repeating questions, which we would have liked. However, the support team helped us find acceptable workarounds. > > This product has significantly reduced the administrative time we spend on grantmaking. We have more than earned back the cost of the license in time saved. ----- ### "The right tool for the jobs" — 5.0/5 > **Derrick** | *20 February 2024* | Primary/Secondary Education | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love the clean design, ease of use, and functionality. The projects and forms are easy to create, highly customizable, and user-friendly for clientele. The ease to which project assignments can be made and tracked is another great feature. We started using Submittable to help us manage a sizable photography contest, and have since been finding ways to migrate other activities/contests (like public speaking, leadership applications, and videography to name a few) into this platform. > > **Cons**: I would like to see some type of organizational structure within forms, projects, and the team to help keep different groups or activities separated. Currently, those lists are becoming quite long and clutter up the pages. A folder system would be ideal that might include activity groups as well as a means to archive forms and projects. Perhaps to help de-clutter, I would like for other teams admins to only see the projects, forms, and reports they created. Team member A doesn't need to see everything that team member B has created. Unless they are a level 5, they only need to see their own work. > > From the product itself to the prompt customer service, everything about Submittable has been very positive. The system functions as advertised and it has enabled our youth development program to administer what has historically been in-person events and activities into a digital format. That has saved time and travel expenses for our employees and volunteers. ----- Page: 1 / 17\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/107673/submittable?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.co.nz/software/107673/submittable) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data